Drawing for LOTTY

USPTO serial 74507096

LOTTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOTTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles M. Marmelstein

CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN, MURRAY & ORAMMETROPOLITAN SQ 655 15TH ST N WSTE 330 - G ST LOBBYWASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelry; namely, necklaces, earrings, bracelets, tie pins, broachesABANDONED—
016stationery goods; namely, letter paper, notebooks, cards, crayons, art paints, pencils, pocket books, ball point pens, pencil sharpeners, letter filesABANDONED—
020novelty buttonsABANDONED—
024towelsABANDONED—
025children's wear; namely, sweaters, pajamas, hats, caps, hosiery, gloves, handkerchiefs, mufflers, and apronsABANDONED—
026hair pins, ornamental ribbons, hair ribbons, safety pinsABANDONED—
028toys and dolls; namely, metal toys, namely planes, ships and trains; plastic toys, namely magic lamps, magic sticks, guns and swords; toy sets, namely toy animals made of plastic or rubber; musical toys, namely melody sticks, yoyos; stuffed toys; masks; balloons; mascots, namely animal-like dolls; mannequin dolls; baby carriageABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 21, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 14, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance