USPTO serial 74507720
INFONOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAFORTE, RENE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFONOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM A MUNCK
WILLIAM A MUNCK NOVAKOV DAVIS2000 ST PAUL PL750 N ST PAULDALLAS, TX 75201-3286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, providing prompt subscriber-oriented wireless message paging services via message pagers | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |