USPTO serial 74509464
EASY-FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2289117Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 1999
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EASY-FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONROVIA, LR
MONROVIA, LR
MONROVIA, LR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle M. Graham
Michelle M. Graham Kilpatrick Stockton LLP31 West 52nd Street14th FloorNew York, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | shoes | EXPIRED | Apr 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 1999 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jan 30, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |