USPTO serial 74509665
PURE GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
KEVIN G SMITH SHOEMAKER AND MATTARE, LTDSTE 1203 CRYSTAL PLZ BLDG 12001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY P O BOX 2286ARLINGTON, VA 22202-0286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and children's pants, shirts, shorts, jackets, sweaters, knit shirts and overalls | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |