Drawing for PIAGET

USPTO serial 74510269

PIAGET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MASIELLO, ANTHO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIAGET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal Gordon

2 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008knives, forks and spoons made of precious metal or coated therewithABANDONED—
014money clips and lighters made of precious metal or coated therewithABANDONED—
021porcelain and earthenware bowls and dishesABANDONED—
025belts, boots and shoesABANDONED—
028board games, golf bags, playing cards and playing chipsABANDONED—
033wines, champagnes and distilled spiritsABANDONED—
034LIGHTERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 18, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance