USPTO serial 74510720
V. T. VISUAL TRAFFIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with V. T. VISUAL TRAFFIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark E. Brown
MARK E BROWN LITMAN, MCMAHON & BROWN1200 MAIN ST STE 1600KANSAS CITY, MO 64105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use by radio stations for scheduling commercials and for generating invoices and maintaining accounts receivable therefor | ABANDONED | May 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |