USPTO serial 74510880
INTERACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned T. Himmelrich
LOAN B KENNEDY ESQ RECOTON CORPORATION2950 LAKE EMMA RDLAKE MARY, FL 32746UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | home office electronic products, namely schedulers/time organizers, telephone dialers, dictating machines, voice recorders, facsimile machines, modems, fax/modems, personal communications devices and telephone answering machines; computer accessories, namely sound cards, data input devices, namely voice command devices, keyboards, modems, electronic data input devices and sensory perception devices; virtual reality devices, namely headgear, massagers, tactile sensory providers, loudspeakers, video projectors and olfactory sensory providers | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | computer game and video accessories, namely computer game sound cards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |