Drawing for REZAPP

USPTO serial 74512405

REZAPP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REZAPP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LINDA L. BERKOWITZ

LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009eliminator/charger, hands-free car kits comprising built-in speakers and microphone, wire and connector together with mounts/holders fitted in the motor vehicle to enable the driver to use the phone hands-free, cellular handheld telephone holders which have the combined features of an eliminator and a charger mounts, cradles, and holders for holding cellular handheld telephones in motor vehicles, cases for holding cellular handheld telephones, antennas, connectors/adaptors used to connect/adapt cellular telephones to antennas, electrical plug-in power cords and electrical power supply adapted for use in connection with cellular handheld (portable) phones; electrical power supply, batteries and antennas adapted for use in connection with cellular transportable phones; battery packs and battery chargers adapted for use in connection with camcorders; battery packs and battery chargers adapted for use in connection with notebook, laptop, palmtop and desktop computers and uninterrupted power supply (UPS) systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 1997REINREINSTATED—
Oct 25, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 6, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 1996DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 22, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 19, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance