USPTO serial 74513131
WELD EVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 1999
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WELD EVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kansas City, MO
AMERICAN RACING EQUIPMENT, LLC
RANCHO DOMINGUEZ, CA
Kansas City, MO
Kansas City, MO
KANSAS CITY, MO
AMERICAN RACING EQUIPMENT, INC.
RANCHO DOMINGUEZ, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Kernell
James J. Kernell ERICKSON KERNELL DERUSSEAU & KLEYPAS LLC8900 STATE LINE RD STE 500LEAWOOD, KS 66206-1983UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive wheels, * excluding motorcycle wheels * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Weld Racing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN RACING EQUIPMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Weld Racing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Weld Racing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WELD RACING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN RACING EQUIPMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named WELD EVO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 20, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |