Drawing for RPI

USPTO serial 74513206

RPI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RPI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gayle L. Strong

GAYLE L STRONG ROTHGERBER, APPEL, POWERS & JOHNSONONE TABOR CTR STE 30001200 17TH STDENVER, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042pharmaceutical and biological product research, development, and testingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 1996ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 15, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 12, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 29, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance