USPTO serial 74513236
SILENT MODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILENT MODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sam Talpalatsky
SAM TALPALATSKY DIRECTED ELECTRONICS, INC2560 PROGRESS STVISTA, CA 92083UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | vehicular anti-theft and security system including a feature that temporarily eleminates all audio emissions | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |