USPTO serial 74513285
STARGATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARGATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H LOCKARD IV
WILLIAM H LOCKARD IV METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER INC2500 BROADWAY STSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | mugs, flasks, drinking glasses, children's dinnerware, children's plastic dinnerware, non-metal decorative boxes, collectible statues made of cold cast resin, lunchboxes, food storage containers, candle holders not of precious metal, paper plates, paper coasters, and paper cups, all associated with a motion picture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER INC.
- Other trademarks owned by METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Le Studio Canal+ (U.S.)
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named STARGATE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |