USPTO serial 74513290
STARGATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARGATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA V MAYER
PATRICIA V MAYER METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC2500 BROADWAY STSANTA MONICA, CA 90404-3061UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | radios, audio and video tape players, walkie talkies, audio chips, magnetically and optically encoded pre-paid telephone cards, night vision goggles, multimedia entertainment software featuring games and motion pictures recorded on CD-ROM, and decorative vinyl magnets for use on refrigerators and elsewhere, all associated with a motion picture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Le Studio Canal+ (U.S.)
- Other trademarks owned by METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named STARGATE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |