Drawing for LARK

USPTO serial 74513537

LARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2099717Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 1997
Examiner
COHEN, JEFFREY R.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT S BEISER

LARK INTERNATIONAL391 W 660 CARIBOU TRAILSAINT CHARLES, IL 60175UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009video and audio equipment, namely, televisions, radios, clock radios, audio and video cassette recorders and home entertainment systems comprising audio and video cassette recorders, amplifiers, compact disc players, tuners, receivers and equalizers and telephonesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 1999CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 1999C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 1, 1999CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
May 25, 1999PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 23, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 1, 1997CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 16, 1997SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 16, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 17, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 24, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 1996PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 22, 1996PRRGPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED—
Feb 22, 1996PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
Feb 22, 1996PRRGPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED—
Oct 6, 1995PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 1995PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 1995PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 1995PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 10, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1995PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 13, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance