USPTO serial 74514731
JANE CHURCHILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JANE CHURCHILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve D Beyer
STEVE D BEYER HICKMAN, BEYER & WEAVER, LLP620 HANSEN WAY, STE APALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | paints for household interiors, furnishings, artwork; varnishes | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | lighting apparatus, namely lamps, lampshades, lampshade holders and parts and fitting therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | leather bags and purses; umbrellas; and cosmetic cases sold empty | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | building materials, namely wall tiles; ceramic tiles; earthenware tiles; and ceramic enamel tiles | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | furniture; furniture and hand-held mirrors; picture frames; non-metal curtain hooks and curtain rails; cushions | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely pants, shirts, skirts, dresses, coats, jackets, and hats; footwear; headwear | ABANDONED | — |
| 027 | floor coverings, namely carpets, rugs, plastic and rubber bath mats, door mats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COLEFAX & FOWLER GROUP PLC
- Other trademarks owned by COLEFAX & FOWLER GROUP PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named JANE CHURCHILL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |