USPTO serial 74515758
VEG-DIET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUEHLING, EVERETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEG-DIET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | vegetable based meat substitutes, prepared vegetarian meals and entrees consisting primarily of processed vegetables, vegetarian burger patties, soups, soup mixes, edible oils, yogurt, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables; lentils, legumes, dried beans, jellies, jams, pickles, processed nuts, processed edible seeds, fried fava beans; seafood products, namely processed oysters, clams, mussels, scallops, salmon; potato wedges, home fries, hash brown patties, processed potatoes, processed baby roast potatoes, potato puffs | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | pasta, pasta sauces, rice processed grains, prepared meals and entrees consisting primarily of pasta, vegetarian burger sandwiches, pizza, chocolates, ice cream, custards, puddings, processed and breakfast cereals, salad dressings; sauces, seasonings, gravies, yeast, mustard, pepper, vinegar, chocolate syrup, corn syrup, flavoring syrup, maple syrup, pancake syrup, table syrup, topping syrup; processed herbs, spices; biscuits, cakes, pastries, breads, buns, rolls, and cookies; corn chips, teas, coffees, and herbal food beverage mixes | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | unprocessed grains and cereals; fresh fruits and vegetables; raw beans; and live oysters | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seenergy Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Seenergy Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named VEG-DIET
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |