USPTO serial 74515823
MOTOCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOTOCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
69710 Tel Aviv, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary A. Donovan
MARY A DONOVAN PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & MENDELSOHN1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | intrusion alarm systems consisting of sensors, control panels and keypads; personal emergency alarm systems consisting of control units, telephone dialers, digital receivers, computers and related software; remote control systems for intrusion and personal emergency alarm systems, said remote control systems consisting of radio transmitters, receivers, control units, computers and related software, wireless intrusion systems and wireless access control systems; telecommunication systems consisting of telephone dialers, digital communicators, digital receivers and related computers and software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |