USPTO serial 74515938
MED-E-NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MED-E-NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY H HANDAL
ANTHONY H HANDAL HANDAL & MOROFSKY80 WASHINGTON STNORWALK, CT 06854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | information communication services for communication between health care professionals and health care organizations, for the exchange of electronic data on a local, regional or national level, communicated by wireless or wireline transmission; information communication services for exchanging digital data between health care professionals and health care organizations, including physicians, nurses, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, veterinarians, medical societies, insurance carriers, government agencies, pharmacies, pharmacy benefit companies, medical offices, hospitals, clinics, laboratories, health maintenance organizations, health care facilities, and other managed care organizations, communicated by wireless or wireline transmission; interactive communication services for health care professionals for receiving and providing digital data relating to patient-specific information including laboratory information, clinical information, hospitalization information, pharmaceutical and prescription information, radiology information, clinical outcome data and patient specific medical history data; information communication services providing information at the point of care to health care professionals and organizations; electronic communication services providing direct message transfer from user send devices to user receive devices; electronic communication services facilitating direct data exchange between multiple communicating software applications operating on multiple remote heterogeneous electronic information systems connected by multiple heterogeneous communication technologies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |