Drawing for MONSTER BITES

USPTO serial 74515942

MONSTER BITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER BITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grant R. Clayton

GRANT R CLAYTONTHORPE N & WESTERN9035 S 700 E STE 200SANDY, UT 84070

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005nutritional supplements, namely ready-to-eat dietary supplementsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 9, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 26, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 15, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 30, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance