USPTO serial 74516113
THE ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen J. Smith
JAY H BEGLER LIDDY SULLIVAN GALWAY BEGLER & COHEN708 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | athletic supporters; dolls and stuffed toy animals; jigsaw puzzles; bendable toy action figures; walking toy action figures; action puppets; inflatable toy figures; bobble head dolls; hand puppets; teddy bears; dartboards; darts; plastic yo-yos; action figures; accessories to be used with action figures; flying discs; dolls; kites; toy rattles and noisemakers for waving; toy trucks; hand and toy balls; workout or Indian clubs; balloons; shoulder and protective pads for athletic use; boxing and karate gloves; toys, namely bath, bathtub, children's multiple activity, ride-on, soft sculpture, stuffed, water squirting and wind-up; discuses | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Semaphore Entertainment Group
- Other trademarks owned by Semaphore Entertainment Group
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named THE ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |