Drawing for MUNCHKIN

USPTO serial 74516183

MUNCHKIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUNCHKIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AVIS FRAZIER-THOMAS,

AVIS FRAZIER-THOMAS WARNER BROS4000 WARNER BLVD156 N ROOM: 5078BURBANK, CA 91522

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper articles, namely lunch bags, gift bags, streamers, banners, napkins, greeting cards, postcards, calendars, stationery, playing cards, coloring books, posters; periodicals and books featuring fictional characters and/or elements from the 1939 motion picture classic in which a little girl and her dog are transported from a midwestern state by a tornado to an imaginary place whose populace includes persons known by the term sought to be registered herein, in which a song is sung featuring reference to being somewhere over a colorful meteorological phenomenonACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 11, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Oct 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 23, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance