USPTO serial 74516189
MUNCHKIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUNCHKIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RETA J PEERY
ELIZABETH H COHEN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, ties, gloves, boxer shorts, underwear, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, tops, sweaters, jackets, sweatpants, shorts, play suits, swimwear, hats, visors, caps, socks, shoes and slippers all featuring fictional characters and/or elements from the 1939 motion picture classic 'The Wizard of Oz' | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |