USPTO serial 74516196
DOROTHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHALLANT, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOROTHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELISE A TENEN-AOKI
4000 WARNER BLVD BRIDGE 5TH FL NBURBANK, CA 91522-1565UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | bed linens, namely pillow cases, sheets, comforters and blankets, table linens, namely tableclothes, napkins and place mats, and towels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |