USPTO serial 74516463
GORO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GORO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William T. Rifkin
WILLIAM T RIFKIN ROCKEY AND RIFKINTWO FIRST NATIONAL PLZ20 S CLARK ST STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper goods, namely comic books, periodicals, in the nature of strategy guides for video games and fiction novels, trading cards, posters and bottle caps; pen and pencil trays, holders, boxes and cases; pencil sharpeners and pencil ornaments; pencils and pens; notebooks; notepaper and pads | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely gloves, bandannas, sleepwear, pants, shirts, sweatsuits, shoes and shoe laces, shorts, socks, sweaters, jackets, hats, masquerade costumes and robes | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | video output game machines; video game disks and cartridges; software programs for video games, hand-held video games, toy action figures and action figure accessories | ABANDONED | Sep 13, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Midway Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks owned by Midway Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GORO
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |