USPTO serial 74516672
C CREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUEHLING, EVERETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C CREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
4550 AA Sas van Gent, NL
4550 AA Sas van Gent, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Hunter, Thomas W. Lindberg, Scott T. Piering
RONALD E HUNTER, THOMAS W LINDBERG SC CARGILL, INCORPORATEDLAW DEPT MS 24PO BOX 5624MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | starches, modified starches and starch derivatives for use as components of industrially produced food preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |