USPTO serial 74517060
NG NASHVILLE GRILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NG NASHVILLE GRILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cottage Grove, MN
Cottage Grove, MN
Chandler, AZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant/bar/nightclub services | ACTIVE | Jul 7, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2000 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 15, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 6, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |