USPTO serial 74517145
TAN BUENA LA GRANDE COMO LA CHIQUITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2338882Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2000
- Examiner
- MELNICK, DIANE B.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TAN BUENA LA GRANDE COMO LA CHIQUITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CERVECERIA MODELO, S.A. de C.V.
11560 Mexico D.F., MX
CERVECERIA MODELO, S.A. de C.V.
11560 Mexico D.F., MX
CERVECERIA MODELO, S.A. de C.V.
11560 Mexico D.F., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 5, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CERVECERIA MODELO, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CERVECERIA MODELO, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CERVECERIA MODELO, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TAN BUENA LA GRANDE COMO LA CHIQUITA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 1, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |