USPTO serial 74517320
PITTA PAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PITTA PAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THREE EL (3) PRODUCTION, SALE OF FOOD PRODUCT AND RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT S.A.
Marousi Attikia, GR
THREE EL (3) PRODUCTION, SALE OF FOOD PRODUCT AND RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT S.A.
Marousi Attikia, GR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Flynt
RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THREE EL (3) PRODUCTION, SALE OF FOOD PRODUCT AND RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by THREE EL (3) PRODUCTION, SALE OF FOOD PRODUCT AND RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PITTA PAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 8, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |