USPTO serial 74517370
WILMER ONE-WRITE ORGANIZER PERFECTLY SIMPLE, YET SIMPLY PERFECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 1997
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WILMER ONE-WRITE ORGANIZER PERFECTLY SIMPLE, YET SIMPLY PERFECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
Dayton, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
Dayton, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
Dayton, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine C. Spelman
KATHERINE C SPELMAN STEINHART & FALCONER333 MARKET STSTE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | accounting system consisting of checks, ledgers, envelopes and a pegboard sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named WILMER ONE-WRITE ORGANIZER PERFECTLY SIMPLE, YET SIMPLY PERFECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 1, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |