USPTO serial 74517517
DENSECODE MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENSECODE MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John T. Wiedemann
JOHN T WIEDEMANN PRETTY, SCHROEDER, BRUEGGEMANN & CLARK444 S FLOWER ST STE 2000LOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and computer software featuring utilities and applications software for constructing, encoding, printing, recognizing, decoding, utilizing, and/or manipulating two-dimensional symbologies and for interfacing therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |