Drawing for DENSECODE MEDIA

USPTO serial 74517517

DENSECODE MEDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENSECODE MEDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John T. Wiedemann

JOHN T WIEDEMANN PRETTY, SCHROEDER, BRUEGGEMANN & CLARK444 S FLOWER ST STE 2000LOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and computer software featuring utilities and applications software for constructing, encoding, printing, recognizing, decoding, utilizing, and/or manipulating two-dimensional symbologies and for interfacing therewithABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 3, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 20, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 22, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance