USPTO serial 74517785
INTERTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. Jaffer
DAVID H JAFFER ROSENBLUM PARISH & ISAACS160 W SANTA CLARA ST15TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |