USPTO serial 74517955
AUTO GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTO GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2M3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Herbert
PAUL HERBERT RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERTSTE 29002 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | dishwashers, appliance mixers, blenders, food processors, garburators | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | residential, business, personal and vehicl alarm systems, wired and wireless, consisting of detectors, alarms, first aid kits, safety kits, safety lights, strobe lights, lanterns, automatic lighting, security lighting, timers, switches, sensors, lighting controllers, light sockets, personal alarms, pull pin, push button or activated alarms, panic alarms, assault sprays, fire extinguishers, fire extinguisher rechargers, locks, vehicular locking devices, noise alarms, sirens, speakers used for emission of alarm siren rounds and voice prompts, burglar resistant containers, pressure sensitive devices, magnetic contacts, heat sensors, glass breakage detectors, glass breakage alarms, remote controls, keypads, LED and LCD displays, and components and accessories therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | humidifiers, de-humidifiers, ovens, electric heaters, air conditioners, irons, hair dryers, refrigerators, stoves, clothes dryers | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |