Drawing for THE PERFECT RECIPE FOR EATING OUT PIT BEEF RIBS CHICKEN SAUSAGE HAM

USPTO serial 74518404

THE PERFECT RECIPE FOR EATING OUT PIT BEEF RIBS CHICKEN SAUSAGE HAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PERFECT RECIPE FOR EATING OUT PIT BEEF RIBS CHICKEN SAUSAGE HAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Winslow B. Flynn

WINSLOW B FLYNN BODIE, NAGLE, DOLINA, SMITH & HOBBS21 W SUSQUEHANNA AVETOWSON, MD 21204-5279UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 1996PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 23, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance