USPTO serial 74519950
MODULAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODULAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S-252 28 Helsingborg, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Schwartz
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST NW STE 500P O BOX 25696WASHINGTON, DC 20007-8696Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | automatic reels for hoses, cables, ropes and wires; conveyors for hoses, cables, ropes and wires | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | fume extractors for extracting welding fumes and other contaminated air from workplaces in factories and laboratories and filtering units and fans therefor; fume extractors for extracting exhaust fumes from vehicles in repair shops for motor vehicles, fire stations and other buildings for vehicles and filtering units and fans therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |