USPTO serial 74520005
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BLUE MARBLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
Torrance, CA
Other trademarks owned by BLUE MARBLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
BLUE MARBLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
Torrance, CA
Other trademarks owned by BLUE MARBLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
ENCOMPASS KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
BLUE MARBLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
Torrance, CA
Other trademarks owned by BLUE MARBLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN J. STRAUSS
STEPHEN J STRAUSSTENTH FL6060 CTR DRLOS ANGELES, CA 90045| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | personal computer software for computer support of analysis of business operations, business processes, business organization and business communications so that improvements may be synthesized and business progress monitored | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1993 |
| 035 | business consultation for the analysis of business operations, business processes, business organization and business communications so that improvements may be synthesized and business progress monitored | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |