Drawing for TELEGREETING

USPTO serial 74520183

TELEGREETING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELEGREETING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunications services, namely transmission of pre-recorded voice scripts by telephoneACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 4, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 26, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 3, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 21, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 27, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 19, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance