USPTO serial 74520383
TOTAL TELECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, JEFFREY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOTAL TELECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Monmouth Junction, NJ
Monmouth Junction, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | procurement services, namely purchasing the installation by others of telephone and paging systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail stores featuring telephones, telephone answering machines, computers, modems, cellular telephones, pagers, facsimile machines and accessories therefore | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |