USPTO serial 74520592
NATIONAL HAIR CARE CENTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATIONAL HAIR CARE CENTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph S. Mowery
JOSEPH S MOWERY GIROIR & GREGORYSTE 1900111 CTR STLITTLE ROCK, AR 72201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hair care salons providing general hair care services, namely hair cutting, styling, washing and drying, permanents, coloring and other treatments and hair care services in general | ABANDONED | May 17, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1994 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |