USPTO serial 74521066
FROOTLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FROOTLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD C. MISKIN
GARY H LAU STOEL RIVES LLP900 S W FIFTH AVE STE 2600PORTLAND, OR 97204-1268UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | candy confectionery, cookies and snack crackers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |