USPTO serial 74522056
NAIL FETISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2166054Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 1998
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NAIL FETISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenwich, CT
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Greenwich, CT
AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. McGovern, Esq.
Jeffrey B. McGovern720 South Powerline RoadSuite DDeerfield Beach, FL 33442Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | artificial nails, nail polish and enamel, acrylic powders and liquids, nail treatments, adhesives, nail gel overlays and activators, fingernail decorations, emery boards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 1996 |
| 008 | nail files, nail buffers files and blocks, cuticle pushers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COSMAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by COSMAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by COSMAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by COSMAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FINANZ ST. HONRE' B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named NAIL FETISH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |