USPTO serial 74522232
TERADACTYL WINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TERADACTYL WINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LES AMUSEMENTS STONE LTEE/STONE ENTERTAINMENTS LTD.
Chomedey, Laval, Province of Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES AMUSEMENTS STONE LTEE/STONE ENTERTAINMENTS LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin MacGregor
MARTIN MACGREGOR MCGREGOR & ASSOCIATES26415V OAK RIDGE DRSPRING, TX 77380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | chicken wings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |