USPTO serial 74522234
BRONTO BURGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRONTO BURGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LES AMUSEMENTS STONE LTEE/STONE ENTERTAINMENTS LTD.
Chomedey, Laval, Province of Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES AMUSEMENTS STONE LTEE/STONE ENTERTAINMENTS LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin MacGregor
MARTIN MACGREGOR MCGREGOR & ADLER LLP26415 OAK RIDGE DRSPRING, TX 77380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | hamburgers on a bun | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |