USPTO serial 74522534
SMART SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
VAN KAMPEN/AMERICAN CAPITAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Other trademarks owned by VAN KAMPEN/AMERICAN CAPITAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
VAN KAMPEN/AMERICAN CAPITAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Other trademarks owned by VAN KAMPEN/AMERICAN CAPITAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence M. Jarvis
LAWRENCE M JARVIS MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTDNORTHWESTERN ATRIUM CTR34TH FL 500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing information and advertising related to financial products or services to financial professionals via electronic mail or electronic bulletin board | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VAN KAMPEN/AMERICAN CAPITAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VAN KAMPEN/AMERICAN CAPITAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SMART SERVICE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |