Drawing for VOGEL

USPTO serial 74522795

VOGEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOGEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucas J. De Koster

LUCAS J DE KOSTER1106 MAIN STP O BOX 801HULL, IA 51239-0801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002paints, enamels, lacquers and similar products for the preservation of underlying materialsABANDONEDJun 7, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 20, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance