USPTO serial 74522844
PARTNERS WITH TOMORROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 1996
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PARTNERS WITH TOMORROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pacific Coast Technologies, Inc.
Wenatchee, WA
Pacific Coast Technologies, Inc.
Wenatchee, WA
Pacific Coast Technologies, Inc.
Wenatchee, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA N. BENADO
VICTOR N KING SPECKMAN LAW GROUP PLLC1201 3RD AVE STE 330SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic components, namely electronic connectors and hermetic sealing devices for electronic packages and connectors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Coast Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Coast Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Coast Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PARTNERS WITH TOMORROW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 20, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |