USPTO serial 74523397
THE SMART ENVIRONMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE SMART ENVIRONMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2E 6S5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene Z. Rubinson
GENE Z RUBINSON LOWE, PRICE, LEBLANC, BECKER & SHUR99 CANAL CTR PLZ STE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | equipment consoles and computer workstations; workstation furniture and accessories, namely credenzas, electronic media desks, workstands and adjustable work surfaces; workstation and console incidentals, namely rear projection displays, monitor and display screen enclosures, monitor and display screen platforms; heaters, ventilators and heater and ventilator controls; task lighting and parts for all of the aforesaid | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | custom design services, consulting services and retail store services in the field of equipment consoles and workstations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |