USPTO serial 74523590
Serial No. 74523590
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 74523590?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Don Mills, Ontario M3B 3K9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BROOKE LOVELL
BROOKE LOVELL HARLEQUIN ENTERPRISES LTD225 DUNCAN MILL RDDON MILLS, ON M3B 3K9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion picture films featuring fictional dramatic works; pre-recorded audio and video tapes, cassettes and disks featuring works of fiction; video software, namely discs and tapes, optical disks for transmitting and reproducing text, sound and/or images; computer software in the field of entertainment, namely visual and textual representations of books for use in CD-ROM and CD-I and user manuals sold therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |