USPTO serial 74524665
PRECIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBER, BRIAN W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRECIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Rosenbaum
JAMES E CROSS OSBORNE MALEDON2929 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products, namely beauty masks, bath oil, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, cold cream, night cream, vanishing cream, body cream, body oil, body lotion, hand cream, skin cream, skin lotion, skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin clarifiers, skin emollients, skin moisturizers, skin gel, skin serum creams and lotions, skin toner, hair removing cream, skin soap, wrinkle removing skin care creams and lotions, shower gel, hair rinses, hair spray, hair styling preparations, hair conditioners, sun block preparations, sun screen preparations, non-medicated lip balm, self-tanning creams and lotions, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion, makeup, and perfume | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | iontophoresis devices, namely electric hand-held activators which enhance the absorption of skin preparations into the skin when applied to the skin | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |