USPTO serial 74524889
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan J. Steiger
SUSAN J STEIGER GOTTLIEB SCHIFF BERGMAN & SENDROFF555 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | communication services in the nature of producing and delivering video-teleconferences by means of satellite, cable or digital transmission | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |