USPTO serial 74524908
PRINTFLOW DIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRINTFLOW DIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London EC1V 9EQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT & GOULD3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic, electrical and optical equipment for package handling while processing and sorting of goods, namely packet/letter sorters, coding desks, postage franking machines; computers, computer programs, in the field of package management and control on disks and tapes | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | document file trays; paper and cardboard leaflet dispensers; packaging materials for packing; product pamphlets and brochures; note cards; postcards; printed tickets; printed labels; stamps; folders, card files; payment orders; bond paper, paper tapes and cards for the recording of computer programmes; printed instructional and teaching materials for staff training; paper envelopes | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of messages and data; facsimile transmission; telegram transmission and communication; telegraph services | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | postal services, namely packaging articles for transportation, parcel delivery by road, rail, air and water and rental of mail boxes; newspaper delivery; courier services; rental of vehicles; warehouse storage; rental of warehouse space; and guarded transport of goods by road, rail, air and water | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | catering services, computer programming for others, chemical technological research; materials testing; copyright management; industrial design and packaging design for others; engineering services; retail store services in the field of providing stationery goods and postal/courier services; rental of vending machines; printing services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Post Office, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRINTFLOW DIRECT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |